Beneath MarketingSeason 2Episode 8
What’s gone is gone? My favourite branch is the one I have to close
In short: A composite autopsy of a branch kept open because we’d spent on it, and a dated rescue-or-close rule written before opening. Season 2 finale.
An autopsy of a branch that wasn’t closed in time, and a rule dated before opening day
Abstract
We say “what’s gone is gone” about everything except the money we’ve put into a losing branch. This episode dissects a composite branch that stayed open because we’d spent on it, and proposes a rescue-or-close rule, with a date, written before the branch opens.
Before you sign the next branch, write its rescue-or-close rule, with its date, before it opens.
When to come back to this episode: Before you sign any new branch, and when you are asked for more patience with a losing one.
The Thursday branch
In most groups I know, there’s one branch the owner visits on Thursdays. It isn’t the most profitable, or the closest to home. It’s the one he chose himself, on the street he always wanted to be on, the one he described in the expansion meeting as “different”.
When that branch’s file comes up in the review committee, the room changes its tone. The same numbers that close other branches become “circumstances” here: the street hasn’t matured yet, the season didn’t help, the new manager needs time.
The car at the workshop
You have an old car. Last month you paid twenty thousand riyals for the engine at the Sinaiyah, Riyadh’s industrial workshop district. This month it’s back, and the gearbox needs eight thousand. And you say, “I can’t sell it now, I’ve just spent on the engine.”
The twenty thousand is gone. It’s gone if you sell the car, and it’s gone if you fix it. The only question worth asking is whether this car deserves the next eight thousand. But the mind doesn’t ask that. It asks, “How can I let the twenty go to waste?”
Chart
The twenty thousand is gone either way
The only question: does the car deserve this eight?
Source: The episode's image.
Data as a table
| Gone (SAR) | New money (SAR) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sell the car | 20,000 | 0 |
| Fix the gearbox | 20,000 | 8,000 |
A losing branch is a car at the workshop.
The saying is right; we apply it to the wrong thing
Illi fat mat, “what’s gone is gone”, is some of the wisest advice our elders left us. We say it to forgive, to close a quarrel, to start again. The irony is that we apply it to our lessons and refuse to apply it to our money.
We quickly forget why we chose the site and what we assumed in the plan. Yet we remember every riyal we spent on it. It should be the other way round: the lesson should stay alive, in writing, while the riyal already spent is gone, and dead.
What the researchers found
In 1976 Barry Staw published a study titled “Knee-deep in the big muddy”. Business students made an investment decision in a simulation, then learned it was going the wrong way. Those personally responsible for the original decision put more money into it than the others did.1 In other words, the branch you chose yourself is the one you’ll fund beyond what it deserves.
In 1985 Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer documented the sunk-cost effect: people tend to continue with something because they’ve already invested money, effort or time in it. In a field study, theatre subscribers who paid full price attended more plays over the next six months than those who got a discount. One explanation they proposed: we don’t want to appear wasteful.2
There’s no published Saudi study on branch closures, and I won’t claim a percentage. But Staw and Arkes didn’t need a restaurant in Riyadh to describe what happens in the review committee.
The autopsy
Composite example: it combines features of more than one case and does not refer to any specific group or branch. Numbers are illustrative
| Month | What happened | What was said in the room |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Opened at SAR 1.8m capex, 18-month payback plan | “This one’s different” |
| 3 | Ramp index 0.7 | “The street hasn’t matured yet” |
| 6 | The group’s best manager moved in | “It needs leadership” |
| 9 | Façade refresh at SAR 250k | “We’ve spent 1.8m; we won’t stop at a quarter million” |
| 12 | A second launch campaign | “People don’t know it yet” |
| 18 | Contribution after rent negative for the fourth quarter | “We can’t close it now” |
| 24 | The decision that was available in month 9 | “If only…” |
ChartComposite example, illustrative numbers
The autopsy: a staircase of commitment
- 3: Ramp index 0.7 — “The street hasn't matured yet”
- 6: Best manager moved in — “It needs leadership”
- 9: Façade refresh — “We've spent 1.8m; we won't stop at a quarter million”
- 12: Second launch campaign (amount not stated) — “People don't know it yet”
- 18: Fourth negative quarter; payback plan was 18 months — “We can't close it now”
- 24: The decision that was available in month 9 — “If only…”
Source: The episode's autopsy; ramp-index default from the Saudi Scale Playbook.
Data as a table
| Month | What happened | What was said in the room |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Ramp index 0.7 | “The street hasn't matured yet” |
| 6 | Best manager moved in | “It needs leadership” |
| 9 | Façade refresh | “We've spent 1.8m; we won't stop at a quarter million” |
| 12 | Second launch campaign (amount not stated) | “People don't know it yet” |
| 18 | Fourth negative quarter; payback plan was 18 months | “We can't close it now” |
| 24 | The decision that was available in month 9 | “If only…” |
| 3 | 0.7 < 0.75: escalate (Playbook default) | |
| 9 | The decision was available here |
Look at the last column. No one asked, “If we didn’t have this branch today, would we sign for it at this rent?” Every sentence was about the past.
What closing frees
The doctrine has one sentence I consider its hardest: “Keeping a losing branch open is a capital decision too.”3 Closing isn’t a loss. It frees three things:
Capital. The monthly loss, plus the refurbishment riyal and the next campaign, go back on the next-riyal list to compete with a branch that has proved itself.4
Managers. Your best manager spends a year resuscitating one branch instead of opening a new one or training three.
Attention. Your Thursdays. In the last episode we saw that your attention is the slowest station in the company.5
That is the meaning of thesis ten: “not yet” is a decision, not a postponement, and the group that knows when to stop is the group that can keep growing.6
The rule is written before opening
The most dangerous time to write a closing rule is the day you need it. By then you have history with the branch, a manager you like, and words you said in a meeting. That’s why the Saudi Scale Playbook asks for it to be written for every site in the board pack, before signing: the day-90 limits, the recovery owner, and the exit trigger.7 After maturity, the exit rule applies: two consecutive quarters of negative contribution after rent send the branch to a “fix or exit” review.8
I’d add one thing: a date. A rule without a date stretches. Write it like this: “If contribution after rent isn’t positive by [date], the branch closes, unless the rescue is presented as a new investment competing on the next-riyal list.” And sign it before you sign the lease.
SimulatorIllustrative
Rescue or close?
Three roads up to the 30-month payback ceiling: keep it as is, rescue it with new money, or close it. Drag what you already spent as far as you like: the verdict doesn't move.
Result at the default values (turn on JavaScript to move the numbers).
- Negative quarters in a row
- 4
- Rescue payback
- 25 months
- Over 30 months: keep / rescue / close
- −900,000 / +50,000 / 0
- Rescue date
- 3 April 2027
Watch A fix-or-exit review this month. The rescue gets one date (3 April 2027) and one owner; if the date passes and contribution is still negative: close. What we already spent (2,050,000 ) goes in all three roads and never enters the maths. One-off closing costs come from your lease; closing assumes zero from month one (an approximation).
Rule source: Revenue Engineering Doctrine: the next-riyal rule and the exit rule (two negative quarters)
The thresholds for “positive” and “rescue” are yours, from the branch’s own plan. No published Saudi benchmark exists.
Data as a table
| Road | Cumulative over 30 months (SAR) | Already spent (display only) |
|---|---|---|
| keep as is | −900,000 | 2,050,000 |
| rescue | 50,000 | 2,050,000 |
| close | 0 | 2,050,000 |
How it’s calculated
- Consecutive negative quarters are counted back from the latest; two or more = a fix-or-exit review (the exit rule)
- Rescue payback = rescue investment ÷ monthly contribution after it, judged on the 18/30 bands as a new investment
- Over 30 months: keep = latest quarter ÷ 3 × 30; rescue = −investment + 30 × contribution after; close = 0
- What we already spent is displayed and enters no formula
The Sunday question
Rescue or close?
| Question | “If I didn’t have this branch today, would I sign for it at this rent?” |
|---|---|
| Metric | Contribution after rent for every mature branch over the last two quarters; and for each negative one, is there a rescue plan with one date and a named owner? |
| Decision rule | Two negative quarters: a “fix or exit” review this month. A rescue gets one date and one owner. If the date passes and contribution is still negative: close. No second extension unless it’s presented as a new investment and competes on its numbers. |
The thresholds for “positive” and “rescue” are yours, taken from the branch’s own plan. There’s no published Saudi benchmark I can give you.
This week
- Rank your branches by contribution after rent over the last two quarters, and circle every negative number.
- Ask the Sunday question out loud about every circled branch, in front of your CFO.
- Add one line to the model for every upcoming site: the rescue-or-close date, its owner, and your signature.
Credit, and the season finale
Escalation of commitment comes from Barry Staw (1976); the sunk-cost effect from Arkes and Blumer (1985). What I added was the workshop, and a date written before the lease.
With this episode, “The Branch Decision” is complete. Eight episodes, one sentence each:
- Episode 1: A branch is a savings circle where you pay first and collect last, so write and sign your payback ceiling before you see the site.
- Episode 2: A new branch earns its place by the sales it adds, not the sales it moves from its sister branch, so measure the difference over eight weeks against a comparison branch.
- Episode 3: The busy street’s traffic is already priced into its rent, and the winning bidder is usually the one who overestimated most, so set your bid ceiling from your own rent-to-sales before you negotiate.
- Episode 4: The supplier credit every opening brings can hide an old branch’s losses, so run the pause test: your cash if you opened nothing for six months.
- Episode 5: A delivery order is an ad you pay commission on, so count what it leaves after commission, visibility and discounts, and only on the orders that wouldn’t have come anyway.
- Episode 6: Before customers visit, they ask the AI, so make your branch data one asset with one owner and test it with twenty questions every month.
- Episode 7: The company moves at the speed of your signature, so count how long your last ten decisions waited and write your delegation limits.
- Episode 8: Your favourite branch may be the one you have to close, so write the rescue-or-close date before opening day.
One thread runs through all eight: every branch is a capital decision, and its limit is written before the riyal is spent, not after.
Sources and notes
Barry M. Staw, “Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16(1), 1976, pp. 27–44. psycnet.apa.org/record/1976-27199-001 (opens in a new tab)
Hal R. Arkes & Catherine Blumer, “The psychology of sunk cost”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(1), 1985, pp. 124–140. doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978 (opens in a new tab)(85)90049-4
Revenue Engineering Doctrine: the opening gate and the exit rule.
Beneath Marketing, Season 2, Episode 7: The company moves at the speed of my signature.
Revenue Engineering Doctrine: thesis 10, and Lexicon: “not yet”.
Saudi Scale Playbook: the board expansion pack, and the day-90 review.
Cite this
English
Alhajj, S. (2026, September 29). What’s gone is gone? My favourite branch is the one I have to close. Beneath Marketing, season 2, episode 8 (BM S2.E8). seiflden.com. https://seiflden.com/insights/favourite-branch-to-close/
Arabic
الحاج، سيف الدين (29 سبتمبر 2026). «اللي فات مات؟ أحب فرع عندي هو الفرع اللي لازم أقفله». «تحت التسويق»، الموسم 2، الحلقة 8 (BM S2.E8). seiflden.com. https://seiflden.com/ar/insights/favourite-branch-to-close/